This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Use mi_gdb_test in place of gdb_test_multiple. Note, that I had to add "()?" around the first \r\n. The reason is that mi_gdb_test appends \r\n itself, but the "*running,thread-id=all" part is not mandatory. Tested with both read{,1}. OK to apply? 2011-06-22 Marek Polacek <mpolacek@redhat.com> * gdb.mi/mi2-console.exp: Replace gdb_test_multiple with mi_gdb_test. --- gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2-console.exp.mp 2011-06-22 12:58:23.697574353 +0200 +++ gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi2-console.exp 2011-06-22 13:16:48.577665717 +0200 @@ -48,11 +48,8 @@ if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/ mi_run_to_main # Next over the hello() call which will produce lots of output -gdb_test_multiple "220-exec-next" "Started step over hello" { - -re "220\\^running\r\n(\\*running,thread-id=\"all\"\r\n)?$mi_gdb_prompt" { - pass "Started step over hello" - } -} +mi_gdb_test "220-exec-next" "220\\^running(\r\n)?(\\*running,thread-id=\"all\")?" \ + "Started step over hello" if { ![target_info exists gdb,noinferiorio] } { gdb_expect {
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |