This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [doc RFA]: New option --with-iconv-bin
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 23:36:32 +0300
- Subject: Re: [doc RFA]: New option --with-iconv-bin
- References: <20110509181947.6FF002461A8@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <83d3jritdz.fsf@gnu.org> <BANLkTikvtS3eSk_8e+40X5ky9h_HEX5VNQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 13:19:56 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > Why not just say "if your @command{iconv} program is installed in a
> > non-standard place, you will need to tell @value{GDBN} where to find
> > it."?
> >
>
> The iconv program comes from glibc, but you're right, it doesn't
> *necessarily* come from there.
>
> How about this?
It's fine, but...
> +If @value{GDBN} is using the @code{iconv} program and it is installed in
> +a non-standard place, you will need to tell @value{GDBN} where to find it.
The first "it" is ambiguous: it could have meant GDB or iconv.
Suggest a slight rephrase:
If @value{GDBN} is using the @code{iconv} program which is installed
in a non-standard place, ...