Re: replace debug_linux_nat_async with debug_linux_nat ?

[Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>]

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 May 2011 21:25:14, Doug Evans wrote:
>> Hi.
>> Anyone mind if I delete linux-nat.c:debug_linux_nat_async
>> and replace it with debug_linux_nat?
>>
>> I've been in some sessions where I turn the latter on
>> only to find I also want the former, and from what I read
>> I pretty much always want both.
>
> It's considerably more noisy, and doesn't help much
> sync debugging,

I dunno, to each his own for these things I guess.
Plus I'd like to add more and having to think about sync vs async is
time best spent thinking about something else.
I wouldn't mind having different levels of verbosity though.

> but I won't mind.

Thanks.

> Especially since
> I'd like to flip to async on by default

I wonder if sync vs async here is another duality in linux gdb that
can go away at some point.