This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Fixing gdb.base/completion.exp (PR testsuite/12649)
- From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Marek Polacek <mpolacek at redhat dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:54:34 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Fixing gdb.base/completion.exp (PR testsuite/12649)
- References: <4DB82F26.30801@redhat.com> <201105021709.51088.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110502163418.GA30891@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:34:18, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2011 18:09:50 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > This is about completion, using one form or the other.
> > We could move the "\t" form to readline-completion.exp,
> > but I think a systematic approach to testing all the
> > completion methods is better, and helps maintenance in the
> > long run.
>
> I was addressing this by the readline/ and gdb/ parts testing differentiation,
> the first paragraph of my mail.
Sorry, I just snipped it as I didn't have anything to add.
I had looked at your new readline test, and it didn't appear
to cover every of interesting completion variant this
completion.exp test exercises, but I think I may have overlooked.
If it does, then I'll agree with putting that in, and switching
the completion.exp test to "complete" only.
--
Pedro Alves