This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch 4/3] readline-6.2: Substitute inc-hist.texinfo
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:34:51 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch 4/3] readline-6.2: Substitute inc-hist.texinfo
- References: <20110502141121.GA19958@host1.jankratochvil.net>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 16:11:21 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> Used slightly alternative one with IMO better reference and I have also kept
> hsuser.texi in place as readline/ in src/ is no longer a standalone readline
> distribution anyway.
Thanks.
However,...
> --- a/readline/doc/hsuser.texi
> +++ b/readline/doc/hsuser.texi
> @@ -26,9 +26,10 @@ into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions.
> @node Using History Interactively
> @chapter Using History Interactively
>
> -@ifclear BashFeatures
> -@defcodeindex bt
> -@end ifclear
> +@c GDB bundling modification:
> +@c @ifclear BashFeatures
> +@c @defcodeindex bt
> +@c @end ifclear
Why do we need to comment this out? If BashFeatures is not set, the
@defcodeindex line will not be in effect anyway. Is something setting
BashFeatures anywhere when we build our docs?
> This chapter describes how to use the @sc{gnu} History Library interactively,
> from a user's standpoint. It should be considered a user's guide. For
> information on using the @sc{gnu} History Library in your own programs,
> -@pxref{Programming with GNU History}.
> +@c GDB bundling modification:
> +@pxref{Programming with GNU History, , , history, GNU History Library}.
> @end ifclear
Is this because the referenced node is only in the separate
history.info manual, which is not part of hsuser.texi? If so, this is
actually a bug in Readline docs which should be fixed upstream in a
way that allows any project to include hsuser.texi without making such
changes. For example:
@ifset HsUser
@pxref{Programming with GNU History, , , history, GNU History Library}.
@end ifset
@ifclear HsUser
@pxref{Programming with GNU History}.
@end ifclear
Then projects that include just hsuser.texi will need to pass the
"-DHsUser" switch to makeinfo, while Readline will not.
I'm okay with making these changes for now, to allow people building
GDB without failures. But if Chet accepts the above change, we should
switch to it in GDB, so that our doc/Makefile.in is ready for the next
upstream release of Readline.