This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday, March 02, 2011 04:30:08 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2011 02:17:22, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > but i'd like to avoid this step when possible, so how about including the > > generated file too, and adding a makefile target so that it is > > regenerated whenever the .s changes ? > > I don't see where's the chicken&egg gcc needs an assembler, and that gets compiled with binutils/gdb. so i cant make binutils/gdb need a compiler. > but in any case, yep, keeping the > generated file in the tree is what I was thinking. No need to force > people to have a build of a bfin compiler/assembler at hand to build the > host non-bfin gdb. ok, i'll put this together. shouldnt take long. any other feedback ? :) -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |