This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Fix new FAIL `reject p 0x1.1' [fixup]
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:57:19 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> > >> While thanks for catching it I still believe now my testcase update is the
> > >> appropriate fix - if glibc supports then extended input syntax let the GDB
> > >> user benefit from it.
> > >
> > > It's ok with me.
> >
> > I should add that IWBN to have an additional testcase that exercises
> > sscanf (...) == 0 on newer glibcs.
>
> OK, I forgot first. ?OK to check-in? ?Tested both cases (RHEL-4.8 and
> Fedora14snapshot).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
>
>
> gdb/testsuite/
> 2010-08-31 ?Jan Kratochvil ?<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?* gdb.base/printcmds.exp (test_float_accepted): Import gdb_prompt.
> ? ? ? ?Move here, negate and extend by XFAIL the "p 0x1.1" test from ...
> ? ? ? ?(test_float_rejected): ... here.
> ? ? ? ?* gdb.java/jv-print.exp (test_float_accepted): Import gdb_prompt.
> ? ? ? ?Move here, negate and extend by XFAIL the "p 0x1.1" test from ...
> ? ? ? ?(test_float_rejected): ... here.
Apologies for the resend. Somehow it went out as text/html (which the
list rejects).
This is ok with me, but I think you also want to similarly patch
gdb.{objc,pascal}/print.exp, right?