This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, sezeroz at gmail dot com, tromey at redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:46:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
References: <AANLkTilqLsYAUtXVYK-DL-uDFyKVbsxEz2CmJyJoese7@mail.gmail.com> <201007170537.44785.vapier@gentoo.org> <201007171228.o6HCSnd8017188@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Saturday, July 17, 2010 08:28:49 Mark Kettenis wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> > ugh, no.  why not use a sane define like PRIx64 from inttypes.h ?
> 
> "sane" isn't the word I'd use.  Not only do I find them to make printf
> format strings to become unreadable, they also cause i18n issues.

the former is debatable, and while the latter is a valid point in the general 
case, i18n issues in this particular case do not apply.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
  - From: Ozkan Sezer
- Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]