This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New ARI warning Wed Jun 23 01:54:57 UTC 2010

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Pierre Muller <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:58:01 -0700
Subject: Re: New ARI warning Wed Jun 23 01:54:57 UTC 2010
References: <20100623015457.GA20656@sourceware.org> <20100624145616.GA31306@caradoc.them.org> <002501cb13af$e723d1c0$b56b7540$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20100624151512.GX8410@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:14:12PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
I don't really know the origin of this rule, but if you look up the sources, you will see that 'read_memory' is defined in gdbcore.h

So this function should be specific for core management, no?
I don't see why... if it is, it should be renamed.

read_memory is widely used in other parts of gdb.

References:
- New ARI warning Wed Jun 23 01:54:57 UTC 2010
  - From: GDB Administrator
- Re: New ARI warning Wed Jun 23 01:54:57 UTC 2010
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- RE: New ARI warning Wed Jun 23 01:54:57 UTC 2010
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: New ARI warning Wed Jun 23 01:54:57 UTC 2010
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]