Re: [RFA] c++/11734

[Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>]

On 06/22/2010 08:43 AM, Keith Seitz wrote:
> I noticed that I also missed adding this logic to the linear search
> case. I've attached a revised patch which addresses this missed bit and
> moves the alloca out of the loop.

BTW, after reviewing my own patch again, I think it should not break out 
of either loop prematurely: an exact match might later appear in the list.

While this doesn't really affect the ultimate outcome (because we know 
that symtabs will be searched next), prematurely breaking could cause 
lookup_partial_symbol to return NULL when an exact match is really found.

Keith