This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [NEWS/RFA] Re: [gdbserver] x86 agent expression bytecode compiler (speed up conditional tracepoints)
Stan Shebs wrote:
Pedro Alves wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 20:12:44, Stan Shebs wrote:
Doug Evans wrote:Quick thought: can we stick a couple of __attribute__((used))'s in the
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Pedro Alves <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hmm, this particular trickery was my idea, but it always seemed
vulnerable to ever-smarter optimization. Does anybody have any better
strategy? Declaring the asm volatile didn't work, because the compiler
was whacking everything around it.
Thanks. I've checked the whole thing in.I'm getting build failures that go away when compiling linux-x86-low.c with -g.
gcc is optimizing out the skipped over stuff I believe.
The other approach is to build up instructions from bitfields, which is
reliable but needs a lot of setup and helper routines.
macro, so the compiler doesn optimized things away, thinking they're
unused (given the uses are behind asm)?
The compiler is discarding the code with the definitions of the labels,
because it's thinking they are maybe somewhere else in the program (the
error is at link time). Moving the labels into C code would fix that I
think, but then it's hard to guarantee that the compiler won't sneak in
a bit of code between label and asm sequence.
Hurrr. Code that depends on such deep knowledge of the compiler's
behavior is wrong code, IMO.