This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] pr11371 conditional watchpoints with a function in the condition.
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: Chris Moller <cmoller at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 00:54:05 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch] pr11371 conditional watchpoints with a function in the condition.
- References: <4C0936B5.9080002@redhat.com>
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:24:05 +0200, Chris Moller wrote:
> if the condition associated with a
> watchpoint contained a function call, it resulted in a segfault.
> --- breakpoint.c 13 May 2010 22:44:02 -0000 1.486
> +++ breakpoint.c 2 Jun 2010 19:39:12 -0000
> @@ -1355,7 +1355,10 @@
> /* We don't free locations. They are stored in bp_location array and
> update_global_locations will eventually delete them and remove
> breakpoints if needed. */
> - b->loc = NULL;
> +
> + if (b->type != bp_watchpoint && b->type != bp_hardware_watchpoint &&
> + b->enable_state != bp_call_disabled)
> + b->loc = NULL;
This change has a regression for:
int a[1000], *p = a;
int
main (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
p++;
return 0;
}
./gdb -nx -ex 'watch *p' -ex r ./pr11371regression
Watchpoint 1: *p
Starting program: .../pr11371regression
Program exited normally.
->
Watchpoint 1: *p
Starting program: .../pr11371regression
Warning:
Could not insert hardware watchpoint 1.
Could not insert hardware breakpoints:
You may have requested too many hardware breakpoints/watchpoints.
(gdb) p i
$1 = 2
The crash happened due to referencing unallocated memory of a freed
bp_location. Your patch avoids freeing bp_locations in some cases. But it is
not correct as these bp_locations become superfluous causing needless hardware
watchpoints.
I believe this `b->loc = NULL' should remain in place, there is more a problem
of bpstat not linked to thread should get cleared its stale bp_location
reference.
I was thinking more about something around the patch below but it does not
work anyway so just posting FYI. Also maybe on should pre-apply:
[patch 1/3] Clear stale specific locs, not whole bpts [rediff]
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-05/msg00366.html
BTW the testcase gdb.base/pr11371.exp PASSes for me even on FSF GDB HEAD.
Thanks,
Jan
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -4108,6 +4111,9 @@ bpstat_stop_status (struct address_space *aspace,
/* Print nothing for this entry if we dont stop or dont print. */
if (bs->stop == 0 || bs->print == 0)
bs->print_it = print_it_noop;
+
+ if (b->type == bp_hardware_watchpoint)
+ break;
}
}