This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
- From: "Pierre Muller" <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- To: "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz at gnu dot org>, "'Mark Kettenis'" <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:07:14 +0200
- Subject: RE: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
- References: <000001c9e4de$6e550cb0$4aff2610$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MC77b-0001Ke-Vo@fencepost.gnu.org> <000301c9e4e6$b40c5d50$1c2517f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MCAEM-0005ix-2I@fencepost.gnu.org> <001501c9e523$feffc1c0$fcff4540$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MCEm0-0000bZ-9t@fencepost.gnu.org> <000301c9eed3$c7239d80$556ad880$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090622205616.GD7766@adacore.com> <E1MIuRD-0001QO-Dj@fencepost.gnu.org> <000301ca3b83$d15fee00$741fca00$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090924175356.GF2112@adacore.com>
I only wanted to have the fix in the branch,
I don't insist on having the new testsuite files
in 7.0
I was thinking of resubmitting the
watchpoints.exp and watchpoints.c separately again
for main branch only.
Should I commit all together?
I might be able to test it tomorrow on
a Ubuntu inside VMware.
As you prefer!
Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Joel Brobecker
> Envoyé?: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:54 PM
> À?: Pierre Muller
> Cc?: 'Eli Zaretskii'; 'Mark Kettenis'; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet?: Re: [RFA-v3] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
>
> > PS: I tested the patch on Compile Farm, on a amd64 linux,
> > no failure on new watchpoints.exp test,
> > nor on CVS head nor with patched version.
>
> I just wanted to make sure that this is relevant to amd64 as well
> as i386... Otherwise, it'd be nice if you could test it on x86 as well
> before committing to the branch (being paranoid, sorry).
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Joel