Re: final i386.floating.record.patch

[Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>]

Could you try cvs-head?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 21:48, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another analysis and observation is:
>
> I used gdb-6.8.50.20090803 and everything seemed okay.
> Hui used gdb-6.8.50.20090817 and patch was still the same and gdb threw these error.
> was there any thing major changed in gdb ?
>
> and gdb throws error in
> ../../src/gdb/utils.c:1200:
>
> which looks like somebody has allocated memory too much or something has gone wrong in error checking.
>
>
> the floating-point-patch is still the same, if it works fine with gdb-6.8.50.20090803, it is high unlikely that why should it throw memory allocation error with gdb-6.8.50.20090817 (unless system is dangerously low in virtual memory, swap space is full).
>
> Regards,
> Oza.
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 8/17/09, paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> From: paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch
>> To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>, "Hui Zhu" <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>> Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 9:40 PM
>> Hi Hui,
>>
>> I test the same and it seems working fine. Another thing I
>> observe is, vertual memory is low problem and may be gdb's
>> virtual address space gets exhausted or any other limit!
>> highly unlikely though.
>>
>> please see the atached log.
>>
>> linux-p94d:/home/oza/mk_patch/take_diff/gdb_current/gdb-6.8.50.20090803/gdb
>> # ./gdb ./test_floats
>> GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090803
>> Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
>> This is free software: you are free to change and
>> redistribute it.
>> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>> Type "show copying"
>> and "show warranty" for details.
>> This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu".
>> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
>> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
>> Setting up the environment for debugging gdb.
>> Function "internal_error" not defined.
>> Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y
>> or [n]) [answered N; input not from terminal]
>> Function "info_command" not defined.
>> Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y
>> or [n]) [answered N; input not from terminal]
>> /home/oza/mk_patch/take_diff/gdb_current/gdb-6.8.50.20090803/gdb/.gdbinit:8:
>> Error in sourced command file:
>> No breakpoint number 0.
>> (gdb) start
>> Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x8048c94: file ./test_floats.c,
>> line 196.
>> Starting program:
>> /home/oza/mk_patch/take_diff/gdb_current/gdb-6.8.50.20090803/gdb/test_floats
>>
>> Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at ./test_floats.c:196
>> 196? ? ? ???init_floats();
>> (gdb) record
>> (gdb) c
>> Continuing.
>> result is 369.438751
>> result is 10.320001
>> result is 23.008301
>> result is 0.000000
>> result is 10.450000
>> result is 10.776012
>> result is 495830.968750
>> result is -181.778748
>> result is 12.525923
>> result is 2.195619
>> result is 5.055601
>> result is inf
>> result is inf
>> result is -0.988032
>> result is 0.154251
>> result is -6.405331
>> result is 1.537475
>> The next instruction is syscall exit_group.? It will
>> make the program exit.? Do you want to stop the
>> program?([y] or n) y
>> Process record: inferior program stopped.
>>
>> Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
>> 0xffffe405 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
>> (gdb)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oza.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Mon, 8/17/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch
>> > To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>
>> > Cc: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>,
>> "gdb-patches@sourceware.org"
>> <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
>> "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
>> > Date: Monday, August 17, 2009, 12:06 PM
>> > Get some error with this patch.
>> > cat fp.c
>> > #include <stdio.h>
>> > #include <math.h>
>> > #include <stdlib.h>
>> >
>> > /* the test intends to test following insns.
>> > flds faddp fstps fstpl fldl fxch fabs fdivrp fmulp
>> fsubrp
>> > fucomp fnstsw fsqrt
>> > fchs f2xm1 fyl2x fxtract fprem1 fld fdecstp fld1
>> fldl2t
>> > fldl2e FLDPI
>> > FLDLG2 FLDLN2
>> > FLDZ fincstp ffree fptan fpatan fincstp fsincos
>> frndint
>> > fscale fsin fcos fcmovb
>> > fcmovbe fcmove fcmovu fcmovnb fcmovnbe fsave frstor
>> fstsw
>> > */
>> >
>> > float no1,no2,no3,no4,no5,no6,no7;
>> > double x = 100.345, y = 25.7789;
>> > long double ldx = 88888888888888888888.88, ldy =
>> > 9999999999999999999.99;
>> > float result,resultd,resultld;
>> > float *float_memory;
>> >
>> > /* initialization of floats */
>> > void init_floats()
>> > {
>> >? no1 = 10.45;
>> >? no2 = 20.77;
>> >? no3 = 156.89874646;
>> >? no4 = 14.56;
>> >? no5 = 11.11;
>> >? no6 = 66.77;
>> >? no7 = 88.88;
>> >? float_memory = malloc(sizeof(float) * 4);
>> >? *float_memory = 256.256;
>> >? *(float_memory + 1) = 356.356;
>> >? *(float_memory + 2) = 456.456;
>> >? *(float_memory + 3) = 556.556;
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* marks FPU stack as empty */
>> > void empty_fpu_stack()
>> > {
>> >? asm ("ffree %st(1) \n\t"
>> > ? ? ? "ffree %st(2) \n\t"
>> > ? ? ? "ffree %st(3) \n\t"
>> > ? ? ? "ffree %st(4) \n\t"
>> > ? ? ? "ffree %st(5) \n\t"
>> > ? ? ? "ffree %st(6) \n\t"
>> > ? ? ? "ffree %st(7)");
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* tests floating point arithmatic */
>> > void test_arith_floats()
>> > {
>> >? result = no1 + no2 + no3 + no4 + no5 + no6 +
>> no7;
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = fmodf(no2,no1);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? resultd = fmod(x,y);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",resultd);
>> >
>> >? resultld = fmodl(ldy,ldy);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",resultld);
>> >
>> >? result = fabsf(no1);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = no3 / no4;
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = no1 * no2 * no3 * no4;
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = no1 - no2 - no3 - no4;
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fchs");
>> >
>> >? /* test for f2xm1 */
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("f2xm1");
>> >
>> >? asm ("fyl2x");
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fxtract");
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fprem1");
>> >
>> >? /* decrement fpu stack pointer only status
>> register should
>> > get affected */
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >
>> >? empty_fpu_stack();
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld1");
>> >? asm ("fldl2t");
>> >? asm ("fldl2e");
>> >? asm ("fldpi");
>> >? asm ("fldlg2");
>> >? asm ("fldln2");
>> >? asm ("fldz");
>> >
>> >? empty_fpu_stack();
>> >? /* finishing emptying the stack */
>> >
>> >? result = sqrt(no3);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> > }
>> >
>> > void test_log_exp_floats()
>> > {
>> >? result = log10(no3);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = log(no3);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = exp10(no3);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = exp(no3);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> > }
>> >
>> > void test_trigo_floats()
>> > {
>> >? result = sin(30);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = cos(30);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = tan(30);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? result = atan(30);
>> >? printf("result is %f\n",result);
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fptan");
>> >
>> >? /* changes st1 and popping register stack */
>> >? asm ("fpatan");
>> >
>> >? asm("fincstp");
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fsincos");
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("frndint");
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*(float_memory+1)));
>> >? asm ("fscale");
>> >
>> >? empty_fpu_stack();
>> >
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fsin");
>> >? asm ("fcos");
>> >
>> >? /* currently we assume condition likely and
>> always record
>> > the registers
>> >? code could be optimized only if the flag is set
>> then
>> > record */
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fld %0" : :"m"(*(float_memory+1)));
>> >? asm ("fcmovb %st(1), %st");
>> >? asm ("fcmovbe %st(1), %st");
>> >? asm ("fcmove %st(1), %st");
>> >? asm ("fcmovu %st(1), %st");
>> >? asm ("fcmovnb %st(1), %st");
>> >? asm ("fcmovnbe %st(1), %st");
>> >
>> >? empty_fpu_stack();
>> >? /* finished emtyping the stack */
>> > }
>> >
>> > void test_compare_floats()
>> > {
>> > ???ldy = 88888888888888888888.88;
>> > ???if (ldx == ldy)
>> > ? ???ldy =
>> > 7777777777777777777777777777.777;
>> > ???else
>> > ? ???ldy =
>> > 666666666666666666666666666.666;
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* test loading and saving of FPU environment */
>> > void test_fpu_env()
>> > {
>> >? asm ("fsave %0" : "=m"(*float_memory) : );
>> >? asm ("frstor %0" : : "m"(*float_memory));
>> >? asm ("fstsw %ax");
>> > }
>> >
>> > int main()
>> > {
>> > ???init_floats();
>> > ???test_arith_floats();
>> > ???test_log_exp_floats();
>> > ???test_trigo_floats();
>> > ???test_compare_floats();
>> > ???test_fpu_env();
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ./gdb ./a.out
>> > GNU gdb (GDB) 6.8.50.20090817-cvs
>> > Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
>> > This is free software: you are free to change and
>> > redistribute it.
>> > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by
>> law.
>> > Type "show copying"
>> > and "show warranty" for details.
>> > This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu".
>> > For bug reporting instructions, please see:
>> > <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
>> > Setting up the environment for debugging gdb.
>> > Function "internal_error" not defined.
>> > Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load?
>> (y
>> > or [n])
>> > [answered N; input not from terminal]
>> > Function "info_command" not defined.
>> > Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load?
>> (y
>> > or [n])
>> > [answered N; input not from terminal]
>> > /home/teawater/gdb/bgdbno/gdb/.gdbinit:8: Error in
>> sourced
>> > command file:
>> > No breakpoint number 0.
>> > (gdb) start
>> > During symbol reading, DW_AT_name missing from
>> > DW_TAG_base_type.
>> > Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x8048c74: file fp.c, line
>> 196.
>> > Starting program: /home/teawater/gdb/bgdbno/gdb/a.out
>> >
>> > Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at fp.c:196
>> > 196??? ???init_floats();
>> > (gdb) record
>> > (gdb) c
>> > Continuing.
>> > ../../src/gdb/utils.c:1200: internal-error: virtual
>> memory
>> > exhausted.
>> > A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
>> > further debugging may prove unreliable.
>> > Quit this debugging session? (y or n) n
>> > ../../src/gdb/utils.c:1200: internal-error: virtual
>> memory
>> > exhausted.
>> > A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
>> > further debugging may prove unreliable.
>> > Create a core file of GDB? (y or n) n
>> >
>> > Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint
>> trap.
>> > 0xb7eba9bc in memcpy () from
>> /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
>> > (gdb) quit
>> > A debugging session is active.
>> >
>> > ??? Inferior 1 [process 15657] will be
>> > killed.
>> >
>> > Quit anyway? (y or n) y
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Hui
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:16, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > paawan oza wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Hui & Michael,
>> > >> Now we revert status registers also.
>> > >> please find the patch attached.
>> > >> I am sorry, if I am not pasting the patch in
>> > email-body due to tabs&spaces
>> > >> problem faced by Michael last time.
>> > >> Regards,
>> > >> Oza.
>> > >
>> > > Looking good!
>> > >
>> > > There were some conflicts between your changes
>> and a
>> > check-in that
>> > > happened after your submission ?-- ?I've taken
>> the
>> > liberty of merging
>> > > your changes with the cvs head, fixing up the
>> > conflicts. ?Hope you
>> > > don't mind ?-- ?merged patch attached.
>> > >
>> > > I'll review your tests next.
>> > >
>> > > Can you write up a change log entry for this
>> patch?
>> > >
>> > > Hui, Mark, any more comments?
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Michael
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>