This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: dwarf2.h merge

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Binutils Development <binutils at sourceware dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:45:14 -0700
Subject: Re: RFA: dwarf2.h merge
References: <m3skh437vo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20090710151042.GN3181@bubble.grove.modra.org> <4A57B161.8090806@gmail.com>

Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com> writes:

> Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:55:23AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>> 	* Makefile.am (dwarf2.lo): Use dwarf2.h, not elf/dwarf2.h.
>>> 	(elf-eh-frame.lo): Likewise.
>>> 	(elf32-bfin.lo): Likewise.
>>> 	(elf32-frv.lo): Likewise.
>>> 	(elf32-xc16x.lo): Likewise.
>> 
>> You did this by hand?  "make dep-am" in bfd, opcodes, binutils, gas,
>> gprof, ld!  Oh well, binutils parts OK anyway.
>> 
>
>   Side issue: What's the difference between "make dep" and "make dep-am"?

"make dep" changes Makefile in your build directory.  "make dep-am"
changes Makefile.am in your source directory.  For that matter, we still
have "make dep-in" which changes Makefile.in in your source directory.

Basically "make dep" and "make dep-in" could conceivably be useful if
you can't figure out how to run automake.  In practice I don't think
anybody would notice if we got rid of them.

Ian

References:
- RFA: dwarf2.h merge
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: dwarf2.h merge
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: RFA: dwarf2.h merge
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]