This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFC] Insight build problem: was [06/15] Per-breakpoint architecture support
- From: "Pierre Muller" <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- To: "'Ulrich Weigand'" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, <insight at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:49:24 +0200
- Subject: [RFC] Insight build problem: was [06/15] Per-breakpoint architecture support
- References: <200906091517.n59FHee6030279@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> from "Ulrich Weigand" at Jun 09, 2009 05:17:40 PM <200907021716.n62HG5WD005817@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
Ulrich,
your patch made a unlogged change to set_raw_breakpoint:
> ===================================================================
> --- gdb-head.orig/gdb/breakpoint.c
> +++ gdb-head/gdb/breakpoint.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> along with this program. If not, see
> <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
>
> #include "defs.h"
> +#include "arch-utils.h"
> #include <ctype.h>
> #include "hashtab.h"
> #include "symtab.h"
> @@ -104,13 +105,16 @@ static void break_command_1 (char *, int
>
> static void mention (struct breakpoint *);
>
> -struct breakpoint *set_raw_breakpoint (struct symtab_and_line, enum
> bptype);
> +static struct breakpoint *set_raw_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> + struct symtab_and_line,
> + enum bptype);
This seems harmless as the function is not in any header, but
this function is used in gdbtk sources.
I don't really know if gdbtk failures qualify for patches
as such, but it seems to me that it would be difficult to
change the gdbtk-bp.c code to avoid using this function.
Is this failure a sufficient reason to accept this patch
or should we go another route (maybe add set_raw_breakpoint
to breakpoint.h header ?).
Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB
2009-07-07 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
* breakpoint.c (set_raw_breakpoint): Remove static modifier.
Index: breakpoint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.412
diff -u -p -r1.412 breakpoint.c
--- breakpoint.c 2 Jul 2009 17:21:05 -0000 1.412
+++ breakpoint.c 7 Jul 2009 12:45:41 -0000
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static void break_command_1 (char *, int
static void mention (struct breakpoint *);
-static struct breakpoint *set_raw_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+/* This function is used in gdbtk sources and thus can not be made static.
*/
+struct breakpoint *set_raw_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line,
enum bptype);
@@ -4396,8 +4397,9 @@ static void free_bp_location (struct bp_
/* Helper to set_raw_breakpoint below. Creates a breakpoint
that has type BPTYPE and has no locations as yet. */
+/* This function is used in gdbtk sources and thus can not be made static.
*/
-static struct breakpoint *
+struct breakpoint *
set_raw_breakpoint_without_location (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
enum bptype bptype)
{
@@ -4480,7 +4482,7 @@ get_sal_arch (struct symtab_and_line sal
prior to completing the initialization of the breakpoint. If this
should happen, a bogus breakpoint will be left on the chain. */
-static struct breakpoint *
+struct breakpoint *
set_raw_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line sal, enum bptype bptype)
{