This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
- From: paawan oza <paawan1982 at yahoo dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
I am bit relieved to see humble explanation from your side.
I was not aware of the things which you have mentioned.
As I am excited about contribution, I sounded bit hurrying : )
I am sorry for any inconvenience caused.
I will made sure that the test which testes the patch, goes into gdb testsuite.
--- On Wed, 7/1/09, Michael Snyder <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: Michael Snyder <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
> To: "paawan oza" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 12:20 AM
> paawan oza wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have been waiting long for the first patch to go.
> > I have bee trying hard to give explanations and
> include review comments if any.
> > I request, please review the patch and provide your
> > It would be nice to see myself contributing in
> reversible as much as possible.
> > the questions asked by Hui, have already been
> > please see the below mail.
> > Regards,
> > Oza.
> Hi Oza,
> I know you have been waiting a long time, and I
> It is unfortunate that some submissions take a long time
> review, but you are not being singled out.? It took
> over a
> year for Teawater's process record patches to get into
> I certainly hope that it will take less than that for
> but please remember that the volunteer maintainers here
> have full time jobs with their own priorities and
> We're doing the best we can.