This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch

I am bit relieved to see humble explanation from your side.
I was not aware of the things which you have mentioned. 
As I am excited about contribution, I sounded bit hurrying : )
I am sorry for any inconvenience caused.
I will made sure that the test which testes the patch, goes into gdb testsuite.

--- On Wed, 7/1/09, Michael Snyder <> wrote:

> From: Michael Snyder <>
> Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
> To: "paawan oza" <>,
> Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 12:20 AM
> paawan oza wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have been waiting long for the first patch to go.
> > I have bee trying hard to give explanations and
> include review comments if any.
> > I request, please review the patch and provide your
> acceptance.
> > It would be nice to see myself contributing in
> reversible as much as possible.
> > 
> > the questions asked by Hui, have already been
> clarified.
> > please see the below mail.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Oza.
> Hi Oza,
> I know you have been waiting a long time, and I
> appologize.
> It is unfortunate that some submissions take a long time
> to
> review, but you are not being singled out.? It took
> over a
> year for Teawater's process record patches to get into
> gdb.
> I certainly hope that it will take less than that for
> yours,
> but please remember that the volunteer maintainers here
> all
> have full time jobs with their own priorities and
> deadlines.
> We're doing the best we can.
> Michael

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]