This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings.

From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:20:42 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings.
References: <20090523232414.BED2B846C2@localhost> <200906222035.48910.pedro@codesourcery.com> <e394668d0906301449n24a083cfo186bd10dd5280c@mail.gmail.com> <200906302256.40646.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Pedro Alves<pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:49:25, Doug Evans wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Pedro Alves<pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> > On Monday 22 June 2009 18:52:40, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> >?I like gdb's output with
>> > Doug's suggestion.
>>
>> So we have two yeas and zero nays.
>
> To be clear, that referred to the making "gdb program" print
> something (passing !batch as is_atty flag in main.c). ?I haven't
> really looked at the patch or the rest of the suggestion
> carefully. ?:-)

Righto.  I took Tom's email as approval of the patch, his only concern
was to wait to let people comment on the output.

But if you want the patch to wait for more review, ok.

References:
- Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings.
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings.
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings.
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]