This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error


Ping.

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:07, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> PING
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 14:00, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I try this issue with cvs-head. ?It still affect cvs-head.
>> And I try the patch, it can fix this issue. ?It's time close to 7.0
>> branch. ?So could you please help me review it?
>>
>> The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
>>
>> 2009-05-06 ?Hui Zhu ?<teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>> ? ? ? stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>> ? ? ? start address of the function.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 17:00, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> This patch is for bug in http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-01/msg00146.html
>>>
>>> This issue is because sometime the inferior is already in function
>>> start address (i.e. plt), set a breakpoint and continue will make
>>> "reverse-next" work error.
>>>
>>> This patch make inferior step if it reverse step and stop at the
>>> function start address.
>>> It tested OK with process record patch and testsuite gdb.twreverse in
>>> branch reverse-20081226-branch.
>>>
>>> 2009-01-22 ?Hui Zhu ?<teawater@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> ? ? ? ?* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>>> ? ? ? ?stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>>> ? ? ? ?start address of the function.
>>>
>>> OK for mainline?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hui
>>>
>>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]