This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support.
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Tom> How about this? It adds the column headings and prints something when
Tom> there are no inferiors.
Pedro> This is fine with me, thanks, but,
Pedro> are you planning on doing something similar to "info threads"
I wasn't planning to.
Really I just wanted to get column headers for the otherwise-obscure
"info inferiors" columns...
Pedro> IMO, both these commands should be consistent. In that case, you
Pedro> may have an issue with MI, as it calls print_thread_info --- I don't
Pedro> know if using a table instead of a list changes MI output.
I think it does, so changing it would not be ok.
Pedro> (I was a bit surprised to (re-)find that MI doesn't use
Naughty. Though at a quick glance I didn't see where MI does any
printing of the inferiors...?
In this case I think the patch is ok anyway -- an error in "info
threads" does not, IMO, imply that we should propagate the mistake to
other commands. Let me know what you think of this, I won't install
the patch if you feel differently.