This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
- From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: paawan oza <paawan1982 at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:49:57 +0800
- Subject: Re: submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Email body = text part of Email.
Send test format of everything.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 02:51, paawan oza <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi Hui,
> I am not sure whether I followed you correctly.
> please try to clear the comments in lined below.
>> Hi Oza,
>> Thanks for your works.? Before I read your patch, I
>> have some ideas
>> with your RFA:
>> 1. Please don't post compress package.? I did it in
>> before.? But it's
>> not friendly for review.
> Oza : Are you suggesting that, I should send the ChangeLog and README and patch separately without compressing it ?
>> 2. Post the readme and changelog to the Email body.
>> If you like, post
>> the patch to the email body too.? A lof of people like
> Oza : email body is "firstname.lastname@example.org"
> correct ?
>> 3.? Maybe you can post some test example to test the
> Oza : I will post a test example, which could do initial verification for the patch.
>> I suggest you re-send a rfa that post most thing to email
>> body.? And
>> if you want, you can post the url to
>> "Support i386 more
> Oza : what is RFA? after posting are you suggesting, that I should change
> the wiki contents ? and post it to "email-body" ?