This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: TR: ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009
- From: "Pierre Muller" <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- To: "'Vladimir Prus'" <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: <tromey at redhat dot com>, "'Thiago Jung Bauermann'" <bauerman at br dot ibm dot com>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:31:30 +0200
- Subject: RE: TR: ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009
- References: <000001c9e02a$034bb030$09e31090$@u-strasbg.fr> <200905291140.18693.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> > Objet : ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009
> >
> > 657a658,659
> > > gdb/mi/mi-cmd-var.c:251: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be
> marked
> I am missing context on this email, but at least in MI, it's not yet
> clear
> which messages should be i18n and which are not. Some are results of
> frontend
> coding bug and as such should be never presented to user and should not
> be
> ever translated. And if they are translated, they won't help the user
> but
> will make it harder to understand the error for developer.
You are probably right... I don't know much about mi...
Should this warning disappear for mi directory altogether,
or should we add a /* ARI: _ markup */ to silence gdb_ari.sh
where translation is discouraged?
Pierre
PS: Could you take care of the missing "_()"
in gdb/varobj.c source?
I think that these are the kind of patches that can go in
as obvious, as all mechanical ARI fixes.
I hope that I translated correctly here my
remembering of discussions that we had about this.