Re: [RFC-v2] Remove i386 low level debug register function from nm- header file.

["Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > When you build on a 32-bit system, this probably won't result in
> > an error, even though it's strictly speaking still invalid C ...
> 
> What is invalid C?

Assigning a function with prototype
   void func (unsigned long arg);
to a function pointer with prototype
   void (*ptr) (unsigned arg);

(even on platforms where "unsigned long" is the same size as
"unsigned").

> > As far as I know, those values are in fact 32-bit, so I guess
> > "unsigned" (or preferably, "unsigned int") should be OK to use.
> 
> I see no need to add "int" to "unsigned", FWIW.

My comment was just for consistency with the rest of the code base.
I though we were not using plain "unsigned" anywhere else.  However,
after checking the code base, it seems there's already a number of
places that do so.  I don't really mind then, so I withdraw the 
suggestion to use "unsigned int".

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com