This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA Precord] Disable process record in amd64

From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 00:30:48 +0800
Subject: Re: [RFA Precord] Disable process record in amd64
References: <daef60380905130107g27f33764lfdc001ebad883bbc@mail.gmail.com> <200905131118.02697.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 18:18, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009 09:07:03, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The i386 process record can't work together with amd64 now. ?So I make
>> a patch to disable it in amd64.
>
> It would be better to move the `set_gdbarch_process_record (gdbarch, i386_process_record)'
> call to tdep files where precord will actually work --- in this
> case, i386-linux-tdep.c --- instead of having i386-tdep.c assume
> precord support. ?We've done the exact same thing for displaced
> stepping.
>

Maybe make i386_process_record support x86-64 is better.
Forget this patch.

Thanks,
Hui

References:
- [RFA Precord] Disable process record in amd64
  - From: Hui Zhu
- Re: [RFA Precord] Disable process record in amd64
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]