This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:27:09 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).
References: <8ac60eac0905051749p3b5d14d9q8903b9de8e18137f@mail.gmail.com> <20090512082530.GD7584@adacore.com> <8ac60eac0905121353i4aae7110sebb34bec1de0d6d8@mail.gmail.com>

> Because of that, your "maintenance set ..." suggestion doesn't
> make sense to me: why would you ever want O(N*N) algorithm when an
> O(N) one is available?

There was a communication issue somewhere. I didn't suggest that
we should keep the O(N*N) algorithm. The command was on top of already
having the O(N) approach...

-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov

References:
- Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs (part 2).
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]