Re: [PATCH 0/3] catch syscall -- try 5 -- Introduction

[Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>]

It's time close to branch day.
I really want see catch syscall in 7.0.

Thanks,
Hui

2009/4/23 Sérgio Durigan Júnior <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> Hello GDB hackers,
>
> Here goes my fifth attempt to get this patch accepted :-). I believe
> that everything will be fine this time, and the catch syscall feature
> will finally appear in GDB 7!
>
> Things that have changed since the last attempt:
>
> - In the documentation part:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00492.html (from Eli)
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00013.html (from Daniel)
>
> - As for the XML support:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00495.html (from Pierre)
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00012.html (from Daniel)
>
> - Regarding the source-code:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00489.html (from Pedro)
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00010.html (from Daniel)
>
>
> There are other small comments that I have addressed while doing this,
> and other replies to the comments above that I didn't paste. Please, let
> me know if something is wrong/missing.
>
> There's one thing worth mentioning: this patch implements the command
> "maint set data-directory", which is already implemented by one of
> Tromey's pretty-printing patches. If Tromey's patches are accepted
> first, then I can (need) modify my patch in order to use his version of
> the command
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Sérgio Durigan Júnior
> Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer
> Linux Technology Center - LTC
> IBM Brazil
>
>