This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error
- From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: Marc Khouzam <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:31:35 +0800
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error
- References: <daef60380903012210n699d1d94kbb887def12d02e10@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Marc,
I cannot reproduce this issue with cvs-head.
Could you please help me test with this issue?
If both of us cannot reproduce this issue, I think I can give up this patch.
Thanks,
Hui
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 14:10, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> This patch is for bug in
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00246.html.
>
> The reason of bug is when inferior reverse exection into dynsym
> resolve code, gdb doesn't insert breakpoint in right address.
> It just happen in some distributions for example SLED.
>
> This patch make gdb insert breakpoint in right address or step in that case.
>
> 2008-03-02 ?Hui Zhu ?<teawater@gmail.com>
>
> ? ? ? * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
> ? ? ? breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
> ? ? ? into dynsym resolve code.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>