This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 0/8
- From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
- To: "Hui Zhu" <teawater at gmail dot com>, "Pedro Alves" <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, "Michael Snyder" <msnyder at vmware dot com>, "Thiago Jung Bauermann" <bauerman at br dot ibm dot com>, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>, "Mark Kettenis" <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:50:36 -0400
- Subject: RE: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 0/8
- References: <daef60380903210858l5e7868d6g7ce240459c00bae3@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380903292233pa150d36kb8b6c3ee7ce56391@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Hui,
as you know, I am a big fan of your RecordAndReplay enhancements.
In fact, I just demoed it at EclipseCon to show how we can do Reverse
Debugging in the CDT. People were very very interested!
However, I think there are still a few bugs. These bugs may be hard
to notice when working from the command line, but when working in Eclipse
they can be seen easily. Those bugs are mostly unexpected behavior such
as jumping too far backwards. They also happen more easily when using
a program that has a bit of complexity. For example, the recursive
bug that I found last week.
Do you have access to eclipse? We can work together to have you try
the reverse debugging that I added to CDT, so that you can work with
your patches more intensely and test them even better.
I would really like to see your patches in GDB 7.0, so maybe using
Eclipse to test it can help move forward. What do you think?
Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hui Zhu [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 1:34 AM
> To: Pedro Alves; Marc Khouzam; Michael Snyder; Thiago Jung
> Bauermann; Eli Zaretskii; Mark Kettenis
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [RFA] Submit process record and replay fourth time, 0/8
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I am not sure your are reviewing the p record patches or done.
>
> Do you think all of them are ok to in? :)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 23:58, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > After third time submit, there are a lot of change with
> process record
> > and replay. ?So I submit fourth time to make it clear to review.
> >
> > For this time, Most of changes were updated follow cvs head
> and a lot
> > of format fixes. ?Patch for target.c was removed. ?Record.c was
> > updated a lot of parts according to the ideas of Pedro (Much
> > appreciated).
> > Thanks for help of everybody in the maillist.
> >
> > Process record and replay make gdb can record inferior
> execute log and
> > replay (include reverse debug).
> > Now, it support I386-Linux single-thread inferior native debug.
> >
> > I've divided this patch into eight sections, for ease of review.
> > They group as:
> > 1) Architecture support layer (gdbarch.sh, gdbarch.c, gbarch.h).
> > 2) New stratum of strata in target layer (target.h).
> > 3) Process record and replay target (record.c, record.h,
> Makefile.in).
> > 4) Process record and replay for Linux (linux-record.c,
> > linux-record.h, Makefile.in, configure.tgt).
> > 5) Event handling (infrun.c).
> > 6) Intel 386 target-dependent stuff (i386-tdep.c, i386-tdep.h).
> > 7) Target-dependent code for GNU/Linux i386 (i386-linux-tdep.c).
> > 8) User interface and documentation.
> >
> > For the NEWS:
> > * Process record and replay
> >
> > ?In a architecture environment that supports ``process record and
> > ?replay'', ``process record and replay'' target can record a log of
> > ?the process execution, and replay it with both forward and reverse
> > ?execute commands.
> >
> > These patches be tested with testsuite gdb.twreverse in branch
> > reverse-20081226-branch.
> >
> > Attachment is the compressed patches package to make get
> all patches easy.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hui
> >
>