This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Process record and replay, 9/10


> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:04:13 +0800
> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> >> +   these macros are gotten from Linux Kernel source. */
> >> +#define I386_RECORD_SIZE__old_kernel_stat    32
> >> +#define I386_RECORD_SIZE_tms                 16
> >> +#define I386_RECORD_SIZE_loff_t                      8
> >> +#define I386_RECORD_SIZE_flock                       16
> >> +#define I386_RECORD_SIZE_oldold_utsname              45
> >> +#define I386_RECORD_SIZE_ustat                       20
> >
> > Shouldn't this kind of database be in the XML files just posted in the
> > "catch syscall" thread?
> >
> This is the size of variables in the Linux Kernel. I set it special
> because sometime this variables for each arches are not same.

I understand that.  I was asking whether we should store this
information in the same place where we store all the other info about
Linux system calls, not in the source.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]