This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- Architecture-independent part


> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:58:56 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: bauerman@br.ibm.com, sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 08:43:02PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > We could, but that would be second best, IMO.  It would be better to
> > make the abstraction less Unix-centric.
> 
> I don't think that Windows API calls belong in "catch syscall".

You made it perfectly clear that this is what you think, but we will
have to disagree.

Regardless, I still think that the breakpoint.c notion of a syscall
should be a higher abstraction than just a number.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]