This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Share the shared library list between inferiors


On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:29:04PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> There are several ways to skin this cat.  This one seemed like
> the smallest, most extensible and malleable one from GDB's side, because
> it doesn't cast to stone any new protocol extension --- which may
> prove limited to some systems (some memory regions shared, others not;
> some shared but visible at different addresses in different
> inferiors/cores, etc.).  I was hoping we'd cross that bridge when
> we start seeing those systems reporting multi process support
> to GDB.
> 
> What do people think about this?

I have one request.  Could you expand the comment to mention the other
properties you're associating with this flag?

Global breakpoints and a single common target description don't
obviously follow from "global shared library list".


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]