On Sunday 19 October 2008 23:39:20, Michael Snyder wrote:
After codgitating for a bit (that's "thinking" when you're over 50),
I've decided that you're right.
However, I have a new concern -- I'm worried about what it will do
when it's replaying but going forward.
Could you possibly revisit your test and see what it does
if you record all the way to line 9 or 10, then back up
to line 6, then continue with breakpoints at 6 and 7?
Eh, you're right. It's broken.
(gdb) record
(gdb) b 6
Breakpoint 2 at 0x8048352: file nop.c, line 6.
(gdb) b 7
Breakpoint 3 at 0x8048353: file nop.c, line 7.
(gdb) n
Breakpoint 3, main () at nop.c:7
7 asm ("nop");
(gdb) n
8 asm ("nop");
(gdb)
9 asm ("nop");
(gdb) n
10 }
(gdb) rc
Continuing.
Breakpoint 3, main () at nop.c:7
7 asm ("nop");
(gdb) rn
No more reverse-execution history.
main () at nop.c:6
6 asm ("nop");
(gdb) n
Breakpoint 2, main () at nop.c:6
6 asm ("nop");
(gdb)
8 asm ("nop");
(gdb)
9 asm ("nop");
(gdb)
--
Pedro Alves