This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [reverse RFC] Add documentation for process record and replay
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:48:53 -0700
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> CC: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>,
> "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> Eli, I think the relation is that we will save one log entry
> for each instruction executed. Not necessarily that we save
> the instruction itself, but since we do save the PC (it being
> part of the state that is changed by executing the instruction),
> we always have access to the instruction itself if we want it
> (either in memory or in object file).
I understand that (now). But the original text, viz.
When this target is in use, if the next instruction to be executed
is in the execution log, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
made it sound like the instructions themselves are in the log. This
will need to be rephrased.