This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA 03/08] multi-process support: remote multi-process extensions
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 2008-09-12 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>
> Implement multi-process extensions.
This looks basically OK to me. I've got one question, which is not
bad for a patch this size :-)
What about "target remote" vs "target extended-remote"? Are you
always expected to use target extended-remote to connect to a
multi-process target, and if so, should we enforce that? Or are
remote and extended-remote supposed to behave the same if the target
is multi-process?
I ask because of the change in remote_detach_1. If
rs->multi_process_aware is set, we never unregister from
the target. But we call target_mourn_inferior which will unpush the
remote target in that case.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery