This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [reverse RFA] no singlestep-over-BP in reverse

teawater wrote:
Agree with you.

And I think Maybe need add a test for it.
I think is:
1. There is a statement that set the value of a variable.
For example:
a = 1;
2. Before this statement, the value of this variable is not same with new value.
3. Set a breakpoint on this statement, And check the value of this
variable when forward execute and reverse execute program break by
this breakpoint. If the value is the new value, fail. If is the old
value, pass.


That's the idea behind this test.
Do you think this test does what you want?
If not, what would you add to it?

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-09/msg00365.html

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]