This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Pierre Muller <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
Cc: 'Pedro Alves' <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:51:53 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption
References: <000001c8d330$0c6b51f0$2541f5d0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200806231541.26276.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080623173620.GA10962@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <200806231922.10798.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000301c8d566$bb831690$328943b0$@u-strasbg.fr>

> I find it cleaner with signal SIGINT, but it's true that the other
> option is simpler and not that different!

I think most people would expect to see SIGINT. Also, seeing a SIGINT
would make it consistent with what the user would see if the console
was shared.

>   Christopher, should I just remove the ctrl_break_sent variable and
>   let GDB use SIGTRAP signal?

So, I would personally prefered if we kept the SIGTRAP to SIGINT
translation... Just my 2 cents.

-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption
  - From: Christopher Faylor

References:
- [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption
  - From: Pedro Alves
- RE: [RFC] win32-nat.c 'set new-console' and interruption
  - From: Pierre Muller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]