This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc][3/3] Eliminate LOC_BASEREG and LOC_BASEREG_ARG
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 12:57:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: [rfc][3/3] Eliminate LOC_BASEREG and LOC_BASEREG_ARG
- References: <200805191653.m4JGrSZS016848@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 06:53:28PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Removing this also allows us to get rid of the basereg member of the
> aux_value union in struct symbol. (At which point there is only one
> member of the union remaining. Should we remove the union?)
IMO, yes. The remaining union member is probably good for any new
types also.
> Any objections to removing those address classes?
Not from me.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery