This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Regression in exec.c (print_section_info) ?
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at specifix dot com>
- To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 14:32:09 -0700
- Subject: Re: Regression in exec.c (print_section_info) ?
- References: <18453.10856.678467.961230@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080429030510.GA28505@adacore.com> <18454.51085.276103.301144@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080501180625.GC3801@adacore.com> <18458.26814.784453.234316@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 13:05 +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> >...
> >...
> > > Actually it was a context diff - so you can read them! They just look
> > > similar when lines are added.
>
> > Argh. Consider sending unified diffs, I think others prefer them too.
> > When I see context diffs, I usually end up converting it to unified...
>
> OK. On emacs-devel, RMS asks for context diffs but I guess it's the
> maintainer's prerogative to choose.
Last time this discussion came up, someone introduced "diff -up",
which combines the best-liked features of both.