This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] new command to search memory

From: "Doug Evans" <dje at google dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:46:48 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] new command to search memory
References: <20080214021915.F3FE51C72F0@localhost> <20080226022335.GB4456@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0802281844q23f860e7hd4ee9977fdf9b4b3@mail.gmail.com> <20080229031252.GA2897@caradoc.them.org>

Here's the revised "find" patch.  It includes all requested changes to date.

Could someone look at target.c:target_search_memory and make sure it's
DTRT regarding handling targetdebug and falling back on a default?
Given that we're not using inheritance here, the current code seems
like the right way to go, but ...

Ok to check in?

There's still an outstanding issue of supporting this in gdbmi.  I
split find_command into two parts so adding this to gdbmi should be
more straightforward.
And there's also an outstanding issue of if/how to support substring searches.
Both of these issues can wait I gather.

Attachment: gdb-080416-findcmd-6.patch.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Fwd: [RFA] new command to search memory
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]