This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: FAILs on x86?

From: Markus Deuling <deuling at de dot ibm dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:47:45 +0100
Subject: Re: FAILs on x86?
References: <47EB86DF.10803@de.ibm.com> <20080327115104.GA27230@caradoc.them.org> <47EB8FCC.7070509@de.ibm.com> <20080327124424.GA30196@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz schrieb:

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:15:08PM +0100, Markus Deuling wrote:
Nothing special, I think (I dont think its an environment problem). Just a lot of FAILs in gdb.{base,cp,mi}. I posted
a list of the FAILs that are new compared to a testrun some days ago here:
There's something special or they wouldn't have failed.

I meant that it doesn't seem to be a setup problem on my machine or s.th. like that.


--
 Markus Deuling
 GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
 deuling@de.ibm.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAILs on x86?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- FAILs on x86?
  - From: Markus Deuling
- Re: FAILs on x86?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: FAILs on x86?
  - From: Markus Deuling
- Re: FAILs on x86?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]