This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc] Replace x86 register macros


Markus Deuling wrote:

> Thanks for review, I reworked the patch now. Ok to commit?

> +#define I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_ST0_REGNUM(tdep) + 8)
> +#define I387_FSTAT_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep)+ 1)
> +#define I387_FTAG_REGNUM(tdep)  (I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep)+ 2)
> +#define I387_FISEG_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep)+ 3)
> +#define I387_FIOFF_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep)+ 4)
> +#define I387_FOSEG_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep)+ 5)
> +#define I387_FOOFF_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep)+ 6)
> +#define I387_FOP_REGNUM(tdep)   (I387_FCTRL_REGNUM(tdep)+ 7)
> +#define I387_XMM0_REGNUM(tdep)  (I387_ST0_REGNUM(tdep)+ 16)
> +#define I387_MXCSR_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_XMM0_REGNUM(tdep) \
> ++ I387_NUM_XMM_REGS(tdep))

I guess I should have been more specific about the formatting;
this is unfortunately still not quite right:  On the right-hand
sides, you should use normal whitespace rules, i.e. spaces before
the '(' and '+'.  Also, the last line should be properly 
indented, somthing like:

#define I387_MXCSR_REGNUM(tdep) (I387_XMM0_REGNUM (tdep) \
				 + I387_NUM_XMM_REGS (tdep))


With these formatting changes, the patch is OK.

Thanks,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]