Re: Cleanup pending breakpoints floatsam

[Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>]

Jim Blandy wrote:

>>> (This patch was mechanical and touched a number of functions, so I can
>>> understand why you'd rather put off writing the ChangeLog entry for
>>> it.  But in general, a patch should be posted with a ChangeLog entry:
>>> it helps reviewers understand the patch, and of course the entry is
>>> subject to review itself.)
>>
>> It's this a bit too pedantic, for this case? This is as mechanical patch
>> as it can get, so ChangeLog won't have much value in understanding the
>> patch.
> 
> What I meant was, in this case it's not a problem, for just the reason
> you say.  But in general, patches should include ChangeLog entries
> when posted for review.

Surprisingly, should you get to my second patch for today, you'll see
a changelog entry there :-)

- Volodya