This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Backtrace prints wrong argument value
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Luis Machado <luisgpm at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:31:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] Backtrace prints wrong argument value
- References: <20070917131542.GA12835@caradoc.them.org> <1190035779.4651.16.camel@localhost> <20070917133700.GA14300@caradoc.them.org> <1190037624.4651.24.camel@localhost> <20070917140416.GA15635@caradoc.them.org> <1190049306.4651.42.camel@localhost> <20070917171821.GA2107@caradoc.them.org> <1192997096.5584.2.camel@localhost> <20071021232837.GD6180@adacore.com> <20071022010550.GA12211@caradoc.them.org>
> > > > > 2007-09-17 Luis Machado <luisgpm@br.ibm.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > * rs6000-tdep.c (ppc_dwarf2_frame_init_reg): New function.
> > > > > (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Install ppc_dwarf2_frame_init_reg as
> > > > > default dwarf2_frame_set_init_reg function.
> > > >
> > > > OK.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks. I've commited this now.
> >
> > Luis asked me whether he could commit to the branch. I looked at the
> > patch, and it seems pretty safe to me. Does anyone have reservations
> > about this going to the branch? Daniel?
>
> Sounds fine to me.
Thanks for the feedback. Luis, I think this is enough approval for
it to go to the branch.
> There are now a pile (three, I believe) of PRs about Solaris build
> failures. Is there someone familiar with Solaris who could take a
> look at them? I think we have one at work that I could borrow for
> this, but it'll take me a while.
Could you point me to them? I will be tied up for the next two weeks
(I'm actually traveling oct-28/nov-02), but I can have a look when
I return.
I propose that we re-use the gdb-6.7 release wiki page to document
the issues we need to fix before gdb-6.7.1. I can add these Solaris
one.
--
Joel