This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[rfc] [02/17] Get rid of current_gdbarch in corelow.c
- From: Markus Deuling <deuling at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:53:42 +0200
- Subject: [rfc] [02/17] Get rid of current_gdbarch in corelow.c
Hi,
this patch gets rid of some of the current_gdbarch's in corelow.c
Is this ok to commit?
ChangeLog:
* corelow.c (get_core_registers): Use get_regcache_arch to get at the
current architecture by regcache.
(core_read_description): Use core_gdbarch instead of current_gdbarch.
--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com
diff -urpN src/gdb/corelow.c dev/gdb/corelow.c
--- src/gdb/corelow.c 2007-09-10 23:14:10.000000000 +0200
+++ dev/gdb/corelow.c 2007-10-11 08:10:56.000000000 +0200
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ get_core_registers (struct regcache *reg
".reg-xfp", 3, "extended floating-point", 0);
/* Supply dummy value for all registers not found in the core. */
- for (i = 0; i < gdbarch_num_regs (current_gdbarch); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < gdbarch_num_regs (get_regcache_arch (regcache)); i++)
if (!regcache_valid_p (regcache, i))
regcache_raw_supply (regcache, i, NULL);
}
@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@ core_file_thread_alive (ptid_t tid)
static const struct target_desc *
core_read_description (struct target_ops *target)
{
- if (gdbarch_core_read_description_p (current_gdbarch))
- return gdbarch_core_read_description (current_gdbarch, target, core_bfd);
+ if (gdbarch_core_read_description_p (core_gdbarch))
+ return gdbarch_core_read_description (core_gdbarch, target, core_bfd);
return NULL;
}