This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Docs and NEWS for breakpoint changes
> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:27:34 +0400
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> > > +pending breakpoint that never had its address known,
> >
> > I think this is better:
> >
> > For a pending address whose address is not yet known,
> ^^^^^^^
>
> Did you mean "breakpoint" instead of first "address"?
Yes, sorry.
> > Example, please. A picture is worth a thousand words.
>
> I've added one. Is example with a line as long as 75 characters OK?
@smallexample can handle this (which is why we use it instead of
@example).
> Thanks for review. I attach the revised version.
It's fine, except for a few small gotchas:
> +It is possible that a breakpoints correspond to several locations
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"a breakpoint corresponds".
> +For a C@t{++} constructor, the gcc compiler generates several
^^^
You forgot to replace with @value{NGCC}.
> +by one row for each breakpoint location. The header row
^^
Still only one space.
> +any shared library is loaded or unloaded. Typically, you would
^^
And here.