This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Luis Machado <luisgpm at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:30:37 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints
References: <1187013078.4346.9.camel@localhost> <1187631217.11176.8.camel@localhost> <1187631568.11176.11.camel@localhost> <20070905020350.GA10025@caradoc.them.org> <1188995481.4879.5.camel@localhost> <20070910002103.GA25048@caradoc.them.org> <1189438454.4318.9.camel@localhost> <20070910154443.GA10167@caradoc.them.org> <1189446990.4318.21.camel@localhost>

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:56:30PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
> As for the testcases, since PPC only supports one hardware watchpoint
> per process, we should work that test case in a different way or mark it
> as unsupported for PPC and write a different test case.

Oops, you're correct.  This should be easy to check for in the
testcase; I don't remember if we'll get an error or a software
watchpoint for the second watchpoint.  Actually, I think PPC will
currently "succeed" and things will go wrong...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints
  - From: Luis Machado
- Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints
  - From: Luis Machado
- Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints
  - From: Luis Machado

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]