This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [9/9] expand locations

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves at portugalmail dot pt>
Cc: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 23:42:01 -0400
Subject: Re: [9/9] expand locations
References: <200709080313.33625.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <46E1EAE8.7070603@portugalmail.pt>

On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:20:56AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
> Just one boring question from the newbie:
> 
> Is the the below the correct thing to do put in the headers of the
> new .exp files? Not just the GPL2, but also the dates, and the
> credit (, and the bug mailing list)?
> 
> I understand that the test structure was probably based on
> an existing test as template.

Depending how much of the test was based on another, the dates may be
appropriate.  The contributed-by notice is not - and the mailing list
isn't either; we should really strip all the prep.ai.mit.edu
references one of these days.

There's more per-test boilerplate that can go too, e.g. the tracelevel
stuff and clearing prms_id.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [9/9] expand locations
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [9/9] expand locations
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]