This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc] Replace macros by gdbarch functions in gdbint manual
> Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, deuling@de.ibm.com,
> gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com
> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:20:12 -0700
>
> > Or maybe, since you say this is the name of an actual variable, use
> > @code{struct_return} instead of @var?
>
> It's an argument to the function, and our convention is to use @var
> for those, right?
No, not really. However, I missed the fact that struct_return is
already in @var in the argument list of push_dummy, and the wording we
were discussing is part of the ensuing description of push_dummy. So
in this case using @var is exactly right.