This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa] Extra warning in solib-svr4
- From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- To: drow at false dot org
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, kevinb at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:02:12 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [rfa] Extra warning in solib-svr4
- References: <20070330144519.GC14014@caradoc.them.org>
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:45:19 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Suppose you take a static linked program, strip it, and run it under
> GDB. You'll get this warning:
>
> warning: shared library handler failed to enable breakpoint
>
> You can reproduce this without stripping - you need to have no .interp
> section and no functions named _start or main, that's all. So this
> actually came up when using KGDB to debug a Linux kernel.
Trying to debug a stripped static program is a rather silly thing to
do. That said ...
> The shared library breakpoint is generally not important in this
> case. It's more important if there was a .interp but something went
> wrong while trying to load the referenced executable; that's got a
> separate warning:
>
> warning (_("Unable to find dynamic linker breakpoint function.\n"
> "GDB will be unable to debug shared library initializers\n"
> "and track explicitly loaded dynamic code."));
>
> I think the more general warning is not useful, since it has a high
> correlation with non-shared programs. OK to remove it?
... I think the simplification is good, so no objection from me.
> 2007-03-30 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
>
> * solib-svr4.c (enable_break): Simplify return value.
> (svr4_solib_create_inferior_hook): Do not warn if enable_break fails.
>
> Index: solib-svr4.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/solib-svr4.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.61
> diff -u -p -r1.61 solib-svr4.c
> --- solib-svr4.c 9 Jan 2007 17:58:58 -0000 1.61
> +++ solib-svr4.c 30 Mar 2007 14:39:46 -0000
> @@ -979,8 +979,6 @@ exec_entry_point (struct bfd *abfd, stru
> static int
> enable_break (void)
> {
> - int success = 0;
> -
> #ifdef BKPT_AT_SYMBOL
>
> struct minimal_symbol *msymbol;
> @@ -1146,13 +1144,9 @@ enable_break (void)
> return 1;
> }
> }
> -
> - /* Nothing good happened. */
> - success = 0;
> -
> #endif /* BKPT_AT_SYMBOL */
>
> - return (success);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1357,10 +1351,7 @@ svr4_solib_create_inferior_hook (void)
> }
>
> if (!enable_break ())
> - {
> - warning (_("shared library handler failed to enable breakpoint"));
> - return;
> - }
> + return;
>
> #if defined(_SCO_DS)
> /* SCO needs the loop below, other systems should be using the
>