This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Allow dwarf2 debug info for function at address 0

From: Frédéric Riss <frederic dot riss at gmail dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Frederic RISS <frederic dot riss at st dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Steven Johnson <sjohnson at sakuraindustries dot com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:30:06 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow dwarf2 debug info for function at address 0
References: <1153491793.7783.373.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> <20060724200457.GA15759@nevyn.them.org> <1153777182.4946.26.camel@funkylaptop> <20060724220231.GC18918@nevyn.them.org>

Le lundi 24 juillet 2006 Ã 18:02 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz a Ãcrit :
> > I thought that we had issues with relocating the debug information
> > coming from different linkonce sections against the only one kept in
> > the linked file... but that definitely works for me on a simple 
> > example. 
> 
> It depends what version of binutils you've got installed.  At least
> one of HJ's "Linux binutils" releases does this, 

That could be it I think... My home box, on which I tested, runs Ubuntu
Dapper. I didn't know it used HJ's linux-only binutils though. I like to
learn something every day. Thanks for the pointer!

References:
- [PATCH] Allow dwarf2 debug info for function at address 0
  - From: Frederic RISS
- Re: [PATCH] Allow dwarf2 debug info for function at address 0
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [PATCH] Allow dwarf2 debug info for function at address 0
  - From: Frédéric Riss
- Re: [PATCH] Allow dwarf2 debug info for function at address 0
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]